Hats Off to Gmail
OK, so I partially felt bad for the anti-Google sentiment in the last post, but I’ve also been thinking about this topic for quite a while. So what better way to handle both issues at once than to talk about what I like about GMail.
While there’s a lot of things that I think they’re doing right (and maybe some things that I’m not a huge fan of), the best element behind GMail is the conversation view. If you aren’t using GMail (seriously? Are there people like that out there? Cuz I have 99 invites), the notion is that each email thread is represented as one email with multiple messages. Here’s an example from a conversation from HCI Methods class…

I got pretty used to this format in grad school, but now that I’m working and using Outlook every day, I really appreciate the notion of a conversation much more. The reasons are numerous:
- Fewer Emails. As a matter of productivity, you move faster with fewer emails. There are many instances of email threads with 10, 20, or even as much as 50 replies that I get every day. Handling one message is much faster than handling all 50 separately.
- Faster Reading. If there’s a thread that I really want to follow, I usually want to read the emails in order to make sure that I understand them all. In Outlook, I end up putting them all in a folder, essentially creating a conversation view manually (but with more time and effort).
- Easier Saving. What if I want to save the thread? Previous messages tend to be listed below the current message (Gmail also does that), so maybe I save the most recent one. But then tomorrow I get a new message on that thread with more good information. So now I have two emails to save, unless I want to take time to find the old one and trash it. Again, a time waster.
- Fewer Search Results. Hey, someone sent out an email about the great sushi restaurants in Seattle. I’m craving sushi, maybe I’ll search for it. Oh, but there were actually 5 threads, each with 20+ replies. So now I have 100 emails to deal with. In GMail, it would only be 5 results, and you could quickly find the one you want (and ensure all of the information from that thread would be there).
- Ensures Your Voice! This is a new pet peeve of mine - having a conversation carry on without your input!!! When you send mail to 20 people, suddenly 20 people are vying for attention off of one thread. It seems that whenever I spend time to write my reply, someone inevitably replies to a different message in the thread, and the conversation moves in a different direction. With GMail, all replies are part of the same conversation, so nobody’s opinion is getting left out.
So at this point, I’m a little confused. Did Google copyright the notion of conversations in email? Is that why they’re the only ones who have it? While I was skeptical at first, now it seems like such an obvious productivity benefit that I’m baffled that others haven’t rushed to implement something similar.
In Microsoft’s case, however, I suppose they are currently trying to fix the server error on Windows Live Mail that’s been there for a week now. I would switch over… if it worked.
Have you ever used threaded messages in Apple Mail? It’s not as good as seeing stuff inline however.
I still don’t feel comfortable leaving my data with Google. Somehow it’s disturbing that it’s behind some wall I have to get through to. Maybe I’m just old fashioned.
Comment by Jeffers — October 10, 2006 @ 8:27 pm